judges fairfax county

1992 deed

There are three Virginia Land Trust documents recorded in the court records dated October 16, 1992.

The "Deed in Trust under Land Trust Agreement" at Book 8307 pages 1446-1452 (Conveys ownership).
The "Land Trust Agreement" at Book 8845 pages 1449-1462.
The "Power of Attorney" at Book 8845 pages 1444-1448.

(After the Trustee posted his web site http://www.canweconnectthedots.com on March 31, 2012, to try to expose the accounting trails at bk467p191, the Power of Attorney was revoked.)

I don't understand why the 1992 Trust documents are not recognized. To try to keep things simple I will address just one, the 1992 deed for Accotink at bk8307p1446.

My inquiry about whether it would be recognized started after noticing that the legal description for Accotink on the Department of Tax Administration (DTA) records was "WB201-109", which refers to the 1975 Will of H. A. O'Connell at Will Book 201 pages 96-110. The legal description should be the last document transferring ownership and that should be the 1992 deed for Accotink at Book 8307 pages 1446-1452 (Transferring ownership to me as Trustee and not to me as an individual).

Is the last document recognized as transferring ownership of Accotink the 1975 Will of H. A. O'Connell at Will Book 201 pages 96-110, or is it the 1992 deed for Accotink at Book 8307 pages 1446-1452? It has to be one or the other.

I don't understand why both the 1975 Will of H. A. O'Connell at Will Book 201 pages 96-110, and the 1992 deed for Accotink at Book 8307 pages 1446-1452 are now shown in the legal description. This automatically plants conflict and confusion from the start.

Is the 1992 deed for Accotink recognized or not recognized? If not, why not?

It would not be prudent to enter into a sales contract for Accotink withhold knowing if the 1992 deed for Accotink will be recognized. There is a history of surprises at vulnerable times. This is one reason why I have not entered into a sales contract for Accotink.

The voluminous correspondence is presented here in different views and/or sizes to make it more manageable.

Deed not recognized 1a:
Deed not recognized 1a2p:
1975will.The 1975 Will is said to be the document transferring ownership.

Deed not recognized 1b:
Deed not recognized 1b4p:
Divert. Why divert attention from the first three paragraphs of this deed which describe the conveying of ownership, with a photocopy of the fourth paragraph. which doesn't?

Deed not recognized 1c:
Deed not recognized 1c3p:
Defer. Why, in 2004, defer taking a position on the 1992 deed?

Deed not recognized 2:
Responses only

Deed not recognized 3:
Responses only grouped by source and/or common theme

Deed not recognized 4:
Inquires and responses, 2003

Deed not recognized 5:
Inquires and responses, 2004 (January- June)

Deed not recognized 6:
Inquires and responses, 2004 (July-December)

Deed not recognized 7:
Inquires and responses, 2005 to 2010

I don't understand why I could not get the Director of DTA to take a position on whether the 1992 deed for Accotink is recognized. I don't understand why the Director says he has given an answer when he hasn't. It is necessary to differentiate between taking a position and what appears to be taking a positon but after close examination isn't.

I'm I being strung along until I enter into a settllement for the sale of Accotink, and then be told that the 1992 Deed is not recognized? Like the surprise at the settlement of my 1988 sale of our homeplace: "... whereas Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee, could not qualify and Herbert A. Higham, Trustee, was appointed to act in his place and stead. (From the April 21, 1988, deed at bk7005p634).