1,475 - 816 = 659
It is essential to recognize the concept of accounting entanglements and 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 is by far the simplest. If you can recognize the dynamics in this entanglement you can recognize the same dynamics in the far more sophisticated entanglements. Let 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 represent all the accounting entanglements described in the blueprint letter of May 19, 1992, and all the accounting entanglements in bk467p191.
An accounting entanglement as the term applies here is an artificially created accounting descrepancy planted in the accounting that is used as a wedge, takeover, and cover tool. Who ever controls the accounting entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled.
The issue is not the amounts. The issue is that they entangle. Small amounts are used which makes them appear unworthy of attention, as if the amounts were the issue. small-amounts.
The CPA Joanne Barnes did the accounting for the Trust in 1991 and created 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 by reporting different amounts to different places when the amounts should be the same. 1,475.97 was reported to the Court and 816.00 was reported to the State and the IRS when the amounts should be the same. She and Edward White and (?) did the accounting for the Estate for the same period and reported the difference of 659.97 to the Court, the State, and the IRS.
If 1,475.97 and 816.00 were corrected to the same number there would be no accounting entanglement.
All you need to know will reveal itself if the accounting trails at book 467 page 191 are exposed. Recognizing the clear accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 is, I believe, the best tool for cutting through the invisible walls of confusion and conflict. How many character assasinations does it take for 1,475.97 less 816.00 to not equal 659.97?
This is huge.(example 1985 split two properties instead of one or the other (2012 Lien)