Attorney Edward White
Does not recognize 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97

Background

The accountants create, record, and approve the accounting entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97.

Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson III approved 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 behind these two items in the Estate accounting at bk467p192 on March 20, 1993:

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust ......................................... 816.00
  Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ..................................... 659.97"

And approved 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 behind this item in the Trust accounting at bk480p1768 on October 4, 1993:

"Payable to the Esate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... $ 1,475.97"

But the accountants don't recognize 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 or any accounting trail for these numbers when I try to correct it. There are many accounting entanglements in bk467p191 obstructing my sale of parcel 0094-01-0017 and covering the actual money trails.

Attorney Edward White

"Your question regarding the wording of Schedule F of the estate tax return which was filed
in September 1992, implying something or another, makes no sense at all.
(From the lawyer's letter of July 20, 1995, to Anthony OConnell, Trustee)

Comment: Edward White reported the following to the IRS:

"Interest due Harold O'Connell Trust                     816.00
 Debt due from Harold O'Connell Trust                 659.97"

in his:

(1) Schedule F of the Estate Tax Return of September 1992
(2) Schedule F of the First Amended Estate Tax Return of June 1993
(3) Schedule F of the Second Amended Estate Tax Return of April 1995